US Supreme Court Acts in Gerrymandering Cases

US Supreme Court Acts in Gerrymandering Cases

June 18, 2018, 1:00 PM

US Supreme Court Acts in Gerrymandering Cases

FILE - Activists from the state of Virginia rally against gerrymandering, in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, in Washington, March 28, 2018.
FILE – Activists from the state of Virginia rally against gerrymandering, in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, in Washington, March 28, 2018.

The U.S. Supreme Court Monday has ruled against state Democrats in a case concerning partisan gerrymandering in Wisconsin, sending it back to a lower court for a decision.

Gerrymandering is the process of redrawing lines of a state’s electoral districts in order to gain an electoral advantage. Gerrymandering on racial and ethnic grounds was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1993, in the case Shaw v. Reno.

The Wisconsin case, Gill v. Whitford, concerned the boundaries of the state’s legislative districts. The plaintiffs in the case argued the districts drawn by the state's Republican-controlled legislature following the 2010 midterm elections unfairly favored the party.

The court said that while its decision “expresses no view on the merits of the plaintiffs’ case,” they would send the case to the lower courts in order for the plaintiffs to present evidence "that would tend to demonstrate a burden on their individual votes.”

In October, during oral arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts dismissed attempts to discern partisan gerrymandering as “sociological gobbledygook.”

‘Yet another delay’

“Today’s decision is yet another delay in providing voters with the power they deserve in our democracy,” said Chris Carson, president of the League of Women Voters of the United States, in a statement. “Partisan gerrymandering is distorting and undermining our representative democracy, giving politicians the power to choose their voters, instead of giving voters the power to choose their politicians.”

Separately, the U.S. Supreme Court also sidestepped a definitive ruling in a similar case in Maryland. The court did not immediately block congressional district lines drawn by Democrats to maximize the party's advantage.

The high court could soon decide on whether to take up a similar case from North Carolina.

Redistricting in the U.S. happens every 10 years, and Monday’s decision is regarded as especially important, coming ahead of the next round of redistricting in 2021.

Earlier this year, Pennsylvania's Supreme Court ordered the state to redraw its federal congressional districts, breaking a Republican gerrymander of the state.

Original Article

CATCH THE LATEST STEVE GRUBER SHOW

WATCH THE AMERICAN SUNRISE SHOW M-F AT 7AM ET.

WATCH THE LATEST EDITION OF WAR ROOM WITH STEVE BANNON

CATCH THE CHARLIE KIRK SHOW M-F AT 12NOON ET.

HUMAN EVENTS DAILYWITH JACK POSOBIEC

CATCH THE LATEST AMERICA'S VOICE LIVE SHOW

JOIN THE ERIC BOLLING SHOW M-F AT 4PM ET.

TURNING POINT TONIGHT SHOW M-TH AT 10PM ET.

WATCH THE LATEST COWBOY LOGIC BARN PARTY

WATCH THIS WEEK'S BREAKING POINT WITH DAVID ZERE

CATCH THE ROYCE WHITE SHOW EVERY SATURDAY MORNING AT 9AM ET.

LAST CALL WITH MIKE CRISPI - SATURDAYS AT 8PM ET.

WATCH THE SHEMANE NUGENT FAITH & FREEDOM SHOW SUNDAYS AT 10AM ET.

MEDIA EXPOSED WITH ADAM WEISS SUNDAYS AT 6PM ET.

SUNDAY IN AMERICA WITH BRIAN GLENN AT 7PM ET.

THE AMERICAN MATRIARCH - MOTHER'S DAY SPECIAL

JOIN US ON GETTR!

JOIN US IN LIVE CHAT 24/7 ON RUMBLE

CHECK OUT THE LATEST TED NUGENT SPIRIT CAMPFIRE SHOW

JOIN US ON OUR 24/7 LIVE RUMBLE STREAM